Design System 2.0

Design System 2.0


Overhaul consistently scaled up its design system to meet its needs for its product ecosystem. But rebranding meant that certain changes in select locations needed to take effect immediately. This meant that we needed to create a new design library and balance/maintain that overlap with what we currently had.

Company

Design System 2.0

Product

Surfboard shaper

Industry

Online sales

Year

2014

Design System 2.0


Overhaul consistently scaled up its design system to meet its needs for its product ecosystem. But rebranding meant that certain changes in select locations needed to take effect immediately. This meant that we needed to create a new design library and balance/maintain that overlap with what we currently had.

Company

Design System 2.0

Product

Surfboard shaper

Industry

Online sales

Year

2014

Design System 2.0


Overhaul consistently scaled up its design system to meet its needs for its product ecosystem. But rebranding meant that certain changes in select locations needed to take effect immediately. This meant that we needed to create a new design library and balance/maintain that overlap with what we currently had.

Company

Design System 2.0

Product

Surfboard shaper

Industry

Online sales

Year

2014

Color

Creating a highly versatile color system was by far the most challenging. Each color needed it’s one internal values that matched the whole in both light and dark backgrounds. These would need to work with other thematic elements like surfaces and elevation in as well as atoms and molecules.

Balancing light and dark color schemes.

Because we banked on Google’s Material 3 guidelines, we had a framework in place that we could bend and manipulate to work within our requirements. But the system could be confusing (even for designers), so I set up a similar system with samples for each hue in light, dark, and neutral modes. This became an essential piece when first discussing the library with front-end.

Alert levels

Overhaul has products dedicated to different (but very similar) goals. Risk Monitoring looks through the lens of security for each shipment. Shipment Manager, on the other hand, is focused on ETA’s (both scheduled and recorded). At times these systems can overlap without limiting the scalability of each product.

©2026 CHRISTIAN SCHULZ
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

©2026 CHRISTIAN SCHULZ
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

©Schulz